|
This article was written by
Manuel Genswein
and Ragnhild Eide.
It is presented on BeaconReviews.com with the author's permission.
All photographs and illustrations are (C) Copyright 2008 Genswein/Eide.
Basic avalanche shoveling is explained here.
|
  |
| Mammut Pulse |
|
  |
| Pieps DSP |
|
  |
| ARVA Link |
|
  |
| Ortovox S1+ |
|
  |
| Tracker2 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Positioning of rescuers: quick measurement of distance between shovelers. |
|
Working in sectors on the snow conveyor belt: snow is transported
with paddling motions. |
 |
|
 |
| Clockwise rotation is initiated by the front person: job rotation
maintains a high level of motivation and minimizes early fatigue. |
|
Buried victim is first seen: more rescuers are needed at the front,
and the snow conveyor belt only need be kept partially running. |
 |
|
 |
| Careful work near the buried victim while some shovelers aggressively
cut the side walls to adapt the tip of the V to the real position of
the victim. |
|
Interface to organized rescue: more space shoveled only after medical
treatment of victim has started. |
|
Overview
To excavate an avalanche victim takes by far the greatest amount of time during a
rescue. When considering the flow between beacon search and transport of victim, the
gap between a successful hit with the probe and care for the air pocket constitutes
a missing link in the otherwise tremendously well-structured knowledge on rescue. Development
of the “V-shaped conveyor-belt approach to snow transport” started in 2004 and was tested
quantitatively in the spring of 2007 during a large field test. During this test the
uncoordinated approach to shoveling was measured as well.
The environment during the test
A site near the field laboratory of the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute in western
Norway was chosen. A spring snowpack with high density and hardness proved to be a realistic
simulation of dense avalanche debris.
The “victims” were two bags normally used to carry firewood, sewn together and filled
with straw. The texture of those bags closely resembled the stickiness of ski clothing
to snow, therefore making it necessary for the rescuers to completely remove all snow
before being able to transport the victims. In order to avoid a loosening of the debris
around the victims, great care was taken to dig small shafts during burial. In addition,
the snow around the victims has been left to re-freeze on the surface during one night.
The next day the snow around the victims was stomped down layer by layer. The day after
– therefore after three days – the victims were ready to be rescued.
Three different burial depths were used (1m, 2m and 3m) in 2 different slope angles
(flat = 0-5 degrees, steep = 20-25 degrees).
Choice of rescuers
 |
| Using the V-shaped conveyer-belt approach, coordinated shovelers transport
snow centrally downhill. |
| |
 |
| Experienced rescuers adapt shoveling technique to suit individual strengths,
such as coordinated sideways snow transport. |
| |
 |
| After first visual contact with a buried victim , the front team continues
to work together. |
All “rescuers” were chosen carefully. With ages between 19 and 39, they represented
the age group that statistically most often becomes avalanche victims. Men and women
from three different countries were chosen; the ensuing language challenges simulated
to a certain degree the communication problems that often occur between rescuers who
speak the same language with increased stress levels during a real incident. The call
for volunteers read: “four-day avalanche course free of charge, including food, including
active participation in a two-day digging experiment.”
The digging experiment
In order to eliminate exhaustion as cause for potential mistakes, the digging experiments
were spread over four days. After digging for a short while, the rescuers were assigned
a less physically challenging learning module, after which another section of work with
the shovel was completed.
Collection of data
The hole's depth increase was measured every 30 seconds. After every excavation
the hole and excavated volume were carefully measured. The time measurements included
first visual contact with the victim, head (airway) access time, first visual of the
full body, lifting of the victim, and positioning the victim outside the burial site.
Documentation included high-definition pictures as well as real-time video. An instructional
video is available.
Challenges for an efficient and careful excavation
During companion rescue a single probe is normally used to locate the victim; this
can result in little knowledge about the positioning of the body. On one hand a quick
approach to the airway is necessary; on the other hand a certain amount of snow needs
to be transported to facilitate efficient removal of the mass of snow. Furthermore,
rescuers should be positioned so that the buried subject and possible air pocket are
not endangered. The V-shaped conveyor-belt approach to snow transport is the answer
to this challenge.
How to work efficiently over a long period of time
One major requirement of an effective rescue is to maintain the efficiency of the
rescuers at a constant level. So the question was: Why do rescuers get exhausted so
quickly when they apply uncoordinated shoveling? We wanted to avoid having the rescuers
fatigue easily when shoveling as this results in longer breaks and therefore an undesired
slowdown of active resources. We noted that rescuers achieve rapid exhaustion due to
holding an ergonomically challenging position over a long period of time. In response,
we found that clockwise rotation of rescuers every four minutes in the V-shaped conveyor
belt method avoided this early exhaustion. The idea of job rotation has been used in
industrial production for a long time.
An additional challenge to efficiency is the method of snow transport. Vertical lifting
of snow constitutes one of the least efficient methods – despite maximum use of strength,
snow still does not get transferred away from the victim. The bigger the lift with the
shovel, the bigger the amount of snow that can fall off the shovel. A paddling motion,
with which the rotation of the whole body can be utilized as opposed to just using the
arms, is much more efficient and results in a bigger mass of snow to be transported
(measured in liters/rescuers/minute). Methods that suggest steps be dug for snow transport
or methods suggesting kneeling or sitting positions are just as inefficient.
Size of the V and required number of rescuers
  |
| Pulse Package |
The size of the “V” can be deduced from the burial depth known by probing. In a flat
debris field (0-5 degrees), the required length of the V equals double the burial depth.
On a steep slope (20-25 degrees), the length of the V equals the burial depth. Values
in-between can be guessed. The width of the V at its open end always equals burial depth.
As a general rule, one rescuer can cover 80cm of the V's height. If a victim
is buried 2m on a flat area, 2x2m = 4m/80cm = 5 is the perfect number of rescuers. It’s
up to the rescuers where to position themselves within their sector of V height.
Companion rescuers have shown difficulty shoveling with the same efficiency on both
their right and the left sides. Therefore the working position may be individually adapted
to the current working situation in the V and the best position to cut or transport
snow, as well as the personal, body-specific preference of the rescuer.
Correct handling of the avalanche shovel
All rescuers were taught the correct way to use the shovel (i.e., cut blocks).
Observations considering uncoordinated shoveling
Statistics and video analysis clearly show how often rescuers stepped all over the
top of the buried victim as well as got in each other’s way, resulting in diminished
efficiency for excavation.
Onset of fatigue was rapid, and work was interrupted for everyone while exchanging
a shoveler. With increasing burial depth, not all rescuers could be utilized.
Using the V-shaped conveyor belt approach to snow transport
Rescuers form a V whereupon the two front shovelers are a distance of one shovel
length apart; the rest are distanced two shovel lengths from each other. This positioning
– which can be assumed quickly – enables everyone to work without disturbing each other
while offering an optimal length of motion in the snow conveyor for each person. The
primary job of each person is to move the snow from their segment onward to the next
section behind them. Once there is no snow to transport, blocks should be cut to increase
depth. The person closest to the probe only cuts blocks. The second person starts the
transport of the blocks; the person might still have enough time to cut a few blocks
as well. The further back in the V, the more work is used to transport the snow and
less is used to gain depth. This results in a sloping plane, gaining more depth towards
the buried victim. Due to the right length of the V, it is ensured that the critical
angle of 25-26 degrees is not surpassed, therefore avoiding snow to fall back into the
pit. Rotation of rescuers is initiated by the front person. A four-minute cycle has
been found to be the optimal balance between getting used to the new position and onset
of fatigue. A greater gain in depth was measured during the first two minutes of the
rotation, as opposed to the last two minutes. The psychological effect, resulting in
increased motivation when expecting the rotation, was rated as very important. Of course,
those four minutes don’t have to be measured exactly. At the latest, the rotation should
be made upon the first sign of fatigue by any of the rescuers.
Digging continues in this way until the buried victim is first seen. That’s when
the last rotation is made. Two rescuers should be on top of the V. Those two will work
directly and carefully near the victim, therefore decreasing the amount of snow available
to feed the capacity of the snow conveyor. To compensate for this decrease, the person
behind the first two rescuers should aggressively cut out the sidewalls in order to
make more space for the two front rescuers and to adapt the tip of the V to the real
orientation of the buried subject.
During this phase the first sign of a cave can be observed, as it does not make sense
to take out the entire height of the front and sidewalls. The reason for stopping further
rotation after first visual contact with the victim is the challenge of passing on the
positioning of the victim in a timely manner from the front person to the next. Furthermore
it would be psychologically challenging for a conscious victim to have to adapt to a
different rescuer every few minutes. During this phase, more rescuers are used at the
tip of the V. The V does not need to be fully maintained anymore. Often it is sufficient
to keep only one side of the V open and to use the free space as an additional depository
for snow.
Interface to organized rescue
Once organized rescuers appear on the scene, they often require additional space
for first aid and transport of victim. While this request is well founded, it should
not, however, result in wasting time to gain access to the victim’s airway. Therefore
the V-shaped conveyor belt approach to snow transport should be used for all user groups
until commencement of first aid.
At that time the diggers can step back a couple of meters, and while keeping the
V formation they can start transporting the snow further away to create more space –
unless they are needed for more pressing tasks.
Basic method: additional optimization through micro-management within the V
The V-shaped conveyor belt approach to snow transport constitutes a fast, efficient,
and careful excavation method of avalanche victims. Experienced rescuers may adapt the
base method to suit each individual rescue situation by micro-management.
The avalanche shovel
  |
| Mammut Pulse |
This test was not conducted to systematically test avalanche shovels. However, valuable
observations were made regarding different models of shovels. All rescuers received
detailed instructions in the correct use of each shovel. Not one single shovel failed
due to incorrect use. Plastic shovels serve the purpose of merely “having a shovel”
but usually fail before reaching the first meter of depth. Light metal-alloy shovels
need to be hardened by a metallurgical or temperature process, as the majority of those
metal-alloy shovels from prominent manufacturers were seriously bent after little use.
The front edge cannot end in a triangle with one exposed tip, since that will bend and
deform the entire blade after continued stress. Collapsible handles have a clear advantage
because of the increased length of the shaft, but the two parts must sufficiently overlap
in the extended state. By creating a second hole this doubling can be increased. A D-shaped
(curved) grip proved to be superior to a T-shaped grip. The Voilé Extreme proved to
be a very sturdy and ergonomic working tool.
Thanks!
We would like to thank our participants for their extraordinary efforts. A further
thanks goes to Krister Kristensen of NGI for providing us with a very affordable work
environment at the modern field station.
The results of the study will be presented in Whistler, Canada, during ISSW 2008,
www.issw2008.com. Manuel Genswein
is an independent avalanche instructor. He has taught courses for 15 years in over 20
countries. He can be reached at
manuel@genswein.com.
Ragnhild Eide has been working as a NF mountain guide in Norway since 1997. Since 2005
she has, together with Manuel Genswein, been part of the development of the V-shaped
snowconveyor technique for excavating avalanche victims.
|
This article was written by Manuel Genswein and Ragnhild Eide.
It is presented on BeaconReviews.com with the author's permission.
All photographs and illustrations are (C) Copyright 2008 Genswein/Eide.
Basic avalanche shoveling is explained here.
|
|